Category talk:Character games - Revision history

PPPTeam: complementary sections proposition.

2010-12-02T19:47:31Z

complementary sections proposition.

Aderack at 17:36, 2 December 2010

2010-12-02T17:36:11Z

Aderack at 17:35, 2 December 2010

2010-12-02T17:35:51Z

Aderack at 17:35, 2 December 2010

2010-12-02T17:35:39Z

Aderack at 17:32, 2 December 2010

2010-12-02T17:32:19Z

Aderack at 17:31, 2 December 2010

2010-12-02T17:31:47Z

139.165.203.248: Created page with "This category would essentially become interesting if we also know "what else" type of game remain once we remove character games :P"

2010-11-29T23:03:14Z

Created page with "This category would essentially become interesting if we also know "what else" type of game remain once we remove character games :P"

New page

This category would essentially become interesting if we also know "what else" type of game remain once we remove character games :P

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:47, 2 December 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:

	:Though I kind of would like to see a regular comic based on ''Tetris''. That would take a bit of imagination. --[[User:Aderack\|Aderack]] 09:31, 2 December 2010 (PST)		:Though I kind of would like to see a regular comic based on ''Tetris''. That would take a bit of imagination. --[[User:Aderack\|Aderack]] 09:31, 2 December 2010 (PST)
		+
		+	:so that suggests "world-based game", "mechanics-based game" and "puzzle game" as additional Categories of games, no ?
		+	--[[User:PPPTeam\|PPPTeam]] 11:47, 2 December 2010 (PST)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 This category would essentially become interesting if we also know "what else" type of game remain once we remove character games :P
-: Well, there are games like ''Tetris'' and ''Breakout'' with no real identifiable character at all. games with anonymous characters or avatars, like the ship in ''Asteroids'' or the Avatar in ''Ultima''. Then there are games like ''Gauntlet'' and ''Rolling Thunder'' which have distinctive character design but the characters themselves are more a cipher for the mechanics and the themes. Then you have games like ''Sonic'' and ''Mega Man'', where the character's unique traits or personality form the basis for all other design.
+: Well, there are games like ''Tetris'' and ''Breakout'' with no real identifiable character at all. Then there are games with anonymous characters or avatars, like the ship in ''Asteroids'' or the Avatar in ''Ultima''. Then there are games like ''Gauntlet'' and ''Rolling Thunder'' which have distinctive character design but the characters themselves are more a cipher for the mechanics and the themes. Then you have games like ''Sonic'' and ''Mega Man'', where the character's unique traits or personality form the basis for all other design.
 :You don't play ''Rolling Thunder'' because you're a big fan of Albatross; you play it because of concepts like flipping over banisters and hiding in doorways. You do play ''Mega Man'' because of who and what Rock is, and what that means. There wouldn't be much of a point to a ''Gauntlet'' comic book, but the Archie ''Sonic the Hedgehog'' book has been going for nearly two decades now.
 :Though I kind of would like to see a regular comic based on ''Tetris''. That would take a bit of imagination. --[[User:Aderack|Aderack]] 09:31, 2 December 2010 (PST)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 This category would essentially become interesting if we also know "what else" type of game remain once we remove character games :P
-: Well, there are games like ''Tetris'' and ''Breakout'' with no real identifiable character at all. games with anonymous characters or avatars, like the ship in ''Asteroids'' or the avatar in ''Ultima''. Then there are games like ''Gauntlet'' and ''Rolling Thunder'' which have distinctive character design but the characters themselves are more a cipher for the mechanics and the themes. Then you have games like ''Sonic'' and ''Mega Man'', where the character's unique traits or personality form the basis for all other design.
+: Well, there are games like ''Tetris'' and ''Breakout'' with no real identifiable character at all. games with anonymous characters or avatars, like the ship in ''Asteroids'' or the Avatar in ''Ultima''. Then there are games like ''Gauntlet'' and ''Rolling Thunder'' which have distinctive character design but the characters themselves are more a cipher for the mechanics and the themes. Then you have games like ''Sonic'' and ''Mega Man'', where the character's unique traits or personality form the basis for all other design.
 :You don't play ''Rolling Thunder'' because you're a big fan of Albatross; you play it because of concepts like flipping over banisters and hiding in doorways. You do play ''Mega Man'' because of who and what Rock is, and what that means. There wouldn't be much of a point to a ''Gauntlet'' comic book, but the Archie ''Sonic the Hedgehog'' book has been going for nearly two decades now.
 :Though I kind of would like to see a regular comic based on ''Tetris''. That would take a bit of imagination. --[[User:Aderack|Aderack]] 09:31, 2 December 2010 (PST)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 This category would essentially become interesting if we also know "what else" type of game remain once we remove character games :P
-: Well, there are games like ''Tetris'' and ''Breakout'' with no real identifiable character at all. Then there are games like ''Gauntlet'' and ''Rolling Thunder'' which have distinctive character design but the characters themselves are more a cipher for the mechanics and the themes. Then you have games like ''Sonic'' and ''Mega Man'', where the character's unique traits or personality form the basis for all other design.
+: Well, there are games like ''Tetris'' and ''Breakout'' with no real identifiable character at all. games with anonymous characters or avatars, like the ship in ''Asteroids'' or the avatar in ''Ultima''. Then there are games like ''Gauntlet'' and ''Rolling Thunder'' which have distinctive character design but the characters themselves are more a cipher for the mechanics and the themes. Then you have games like ''Sonic'' and ''Mega Man'', where the character's unique traits or personality form the basis for all other design.
 :You don't play ''Rolling Thunder'' because you're a big fan of Albatross; you play it because of concepts like flipping over banisters and hiding in doorways. You do play ''Mega Man'' because of who and what Rock is, and what that means. There wouldn't be much of a point to a ''Gauntlet'' comic book, but the Archie ''Sonic the Hedgehog'' book has been going for nearly two decades now.
 :Though I kind of would like to see a regular comic based on ''Tetris''. That would take a bit of imagination. --[[User:Aderack|Aderack]] 09:31, 2 December 2010 (PST)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 : Well, there are games like ''Tetris'' and ''Breakout'' with no real identifiable character at all. Then there are games like ''Gauntlet'' and ''Rolling Thunder'' which have distinctive character design but the characters themselves are more a cipher for the mechanics and the themes. Then you have games like ''Sonic'' and ''Mega Man'', where the character's unique traits or personality form the basis for all other design.
-You don't play ''Rolling Thunder'' because you're a big fan of Albatross; you play it because of concepts like flipping over banisters and hiding in doorways. You do play ''Mega Man'' because of who and what Rock is, and what that means. There wouldn't be much of a point to a ''Gauntlet'' comic book, but the Archie ''Sonic the Hedgehog'' book has been going for nearly two decades now.
+:You don't play ''Rolling Thunder'' because you're a big fan of Albatross; you play it because of concepts like flipping over banisters and hiding in doorways. You do play ''Mega Man'' because of who and what Rock is, and what that means. There wouldn't be much of a point to a ''Gauntlet'' comic book, but the Archie ''Sonic the Hedgehog'' book has been going for nearly two decades now.
-Though I kind of would like to see a regular comic based on ''Tetris''. That would take a bit of imagination. --[[User:Aderack|Aderack]] 09:31, 2 December 2010 (PST)
+:Though I kind of would like to see a regular comic based on ''Tetris''. That would take a bit of imagination. --[[User:Aderack|Aderack]] 09:31, 2 December 2010 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:31, 2 December 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This category would essentially become interesting if we also know "what else" type of game remain once we remove character games :P		This category would essentially become interesting if we also know "what else" type of game remain once we remove character games :P
		+	: Well, there are games like ''Tetris'' and ''Breakout'' with no real identifiable character at all. Then there are games like ''Gauntlet'' and ''Rolling Thunder'' which have distinctive character design but the characters themselves are more a cipher for the mechanics and the themes. Then you have games like ''Sonic'' and ''Mega Man'', where the character's unique traits or personality form the basis for all other design.
		+
		+	You don't play ''Rolling Thunder'' because you're a big fan of Albatross; you play it because of concepts like flipping over banisters and hiding in doorways. You do play ''Mega Man'' because of who and what Rock is, and what that means. There wouldn't be much of a point to a ''Gauntlet'' comic book, but the Archie ''Sonic the Hedgehog'' book has been going for nearly two decades now.
		+
		+	Though I kind of would like to see a regular comic based on ''Tetris''. That would take a bit of imagination. --[[User:Aderack\|Aderack]] 09:31, 2 December 2010 (PST)