Miles Drummond’s Jigsaw

  • Reading time:1 mins read

So a while back Enough Plumbers co-designer Arthur Lee started up his Action 52 OWNS game jam, the object being to remake, to the best modern creative standards, each of the famously terrible games in the Action 52 multicart (origin of that Cheetahmen game that 2ch was ironically wild about a while back). To date, nine of the games have been remade. One of those, tackled by a certain Miles Drummond, is the poor man’s Nail ‘n’ Scale clone, Jigsaw.

Add some creative deconstruction, and the end result is a rather charming puzzle platformer that plays a bit like Sega’s QuackShot, enhanced with some annoying-to-me, perhaps engaging-to-others SNES-style switch-block puzzles. You’re a carpenter armed with a nail gun against an army of rogue carpentry tools; you navigate two enormous levels by scaling walls and breaking blocks with your nails. Note that you can only use three nails at a time, a limitation that opens up all manner of puzzle situations.

( Continue reading at DIYGamer )

The Game-Maker Archive: Samples and Demos

  • Reading time:2 mins read

by [redacted]

Recreational Software Designs’ Game-Maker didn’t just throw its users in cold with its development tools and game engine; packed with the core software was a wealth of sample material, largely composed by the programmers, Gregory Stone and Oliver, Jr. Fair enough, this material was a starting place for many, perhaps most, users’ first games.

Yet as simple and illustrative as the material was, it often was more compelling than the end games derived from it. So in effect, in purchasing Game-Maker users bought themselves a collection of rather neat little games and then the tools to rip them apart and rebuild the games in their own image — in concept not all that different from some indie games you’ll see these days, if a bit more elaborate in the toolset.

It would be constructive to peruse these games if just to provide context for of our past discussion (such as last week’s The Descent), and to provide basis for future commentary. Again, though, some of these games are darned good. All of them are charming, and by definition they’re all amongst the most original Game-Maker games you’ll find.

There are seven basic demo games. Three of them are overt tutorials (one of them named Tutor); four are complete and deliberate games of some sort, and the origin of the most of the materials used in those tutorials. It’s those that we’ll be going over here.

( Continue reading at DIYGamer )

Wagging Your Arms Behind You… Love+ [Review]

  • Reading time:1 mins read

by [redacted]

Fred Wood’s Love is not a new game. He first contrived and released it in 2008, as an undergrad sample project. Over the last couple of years he has tweaked and fiddled with the engine and design, first opening up the game to aspiring artists with Love Custom; a stabler version of the engine that came with less music and only the one sample level. It was meant as an empty box, you see, for the end user to fill — rather like Nifflas’ FiNCK.

And then fairly recently, there’s the game’s final incarnation, Love+. The engine is again tweaked, and the levels and music are fewer yet richer than in the original Love. As this is the newest version, and indeed the only version that Fred Wood still supports, I mean to give it the bulk of the focus here.

( Continue reading at DIYGamer )

Explore the Collective Consciousness with Farbs’ Playpen

  • Reading time:1 mins read

Rom Check Fail developer Farbs has unleashed on us all the Web-based communal adventure game creation game, Playpen.

The game presents you with a blocky point-and-click adventure interface; as you click around and explore, you will find your choices leading you down increasingly eccentric avenues — until suddenly you hit the edge of the world. Say you click on a path leading to a fountain, but there is no target page to the click. You are then dumped into a simple image editor, where you can paint the scene yourself and designate however many links you like, to however many other pages.

( Continue reading at DIYGamer )

FiNCK thrown into the Web

  • Reading time:1 mins read

As of yesterday, Within a Deep Forest and Knytt designer Nifflas has unleashed his briefly-awaited user-supported toss-’em-up, FiNCK. As reported earlier, the game’s abrupt announcement and release are due to an impulsive yet inspired development cycle, brought on by affection for the odd man out of the NES Marios.

FiNCK (”Fire Nuclear Crocodile Killer”; yes, it’s nonsense) has the same grab-and-toss mechanics as Super Mario Bros. 2 and a few other gems like Rescue Rangers, and Pastel’s much longer-coming Life+. Perhaps understandably enough, considering the free level editor and Nifflas’ existing fanbase, the game only comes with five (in effect) demonstration levels.

( Continue reading at DIYGamer )

Cactus’ Krebswelte updated

  • Reading time:1 mins read

IGF Nuovo Award winner and Space Fuck! designer Cactus has released an update of his older… well, maybe the best term is roguelike platformer, Krebswelte. In Krebswelte you jump and aim and shoot; every bit of the level geometry is destructible (though it slowly refills, to prevent you from painting yourself into a corner); few objects are helpful, though treasure allows you to buy weapon upgrades, all the better to destroy your world.

The levels are randomly generated; as in a roguelike the only constant is an increase in difficulty from level to level, and only a single life to die… sort of. Usually. There are a bunch of quirks that make exceptions to the rules, and they’re best found for yourself.

( Continue reading at DIYGamer )

The Game-Maker Archive: One-Hit Wonders

  • Reading time:1 mins read

by [redacted]

Recreational Software Designs’ Game-Maker offered aspiring pre-Web designers the world over their first taste of game development. And for its era, it was darned powerful: VGA graphics, Sound Blaster sound, infinitely huge games. There were some strict limitations and quirks, but at the time there wasn’t much else like it — and it sure beat breaking out Lode Runner for the hundredth time, plus the graph paper and pencil to record your levels.

Although the software was cheap and easy to use, and there was a thriving community around it, it seems most users were content to finish at most one or two games, then to move on. As a result you have a handful of big, influential voices — the artists who made a handful of complete, original games — and a peppering of neato one-off games by people you never saw again. And often it’s those oddball games that stick in the mind the most.

( Continue reading at DIYGamer )

David Shute’s Entanglement (tentative)

  • Reading time:1 mins read

Small Worlds is one of the best indie games of last year, and one of the simplest. It’s won some, been nominated some. Been discussed much.

With the appropriate praise in hand, David Shute has set himself to a couple of different follow-up projects: one a much larger, more ambitious piece; the other, a simpler project that might be taken as more of a direct follow-up, or a spiritual successor to Small Worlds. For a while, to avoid repeating himself, he meant to focus on the larger project, but then in late February or early March he had a revelation.

( Continue reading at DIYGamer )

Smaller Every Day… Hero Core [Review]

  • Reading time:3 mins read

by [redacted]

Somewhere in the early 1990s, the console-style adventure game got sort of codified, with Super Metroid as the main reference point. The ideal form, as wisdom had it, gradually opened up the world to the player as the player gathered new and usually tactile abilities, the better to traverse the world’s obstacles. Basically it’s a lock-and-key system, except instead of the green doors requiring green keys they demand super missiles and instead of unlocking the next section you climb or swing or blast your way there, once you’ve the right abilities.

This system is valid enough, and when done well it can be fairly invisible. You notice somewhere that you can’t go, and after trying everything in your power you remember your failure. So when you get a power that might let you past that obstacle, you race back to put it to use. The clever thing is that usually this new ability generally improves the player’s character, and slots into the existing move set naturally enough that soon the player kind of forgets that ability hadn’t been there the whole time.

This design’s appeal rests in an illusion of problem solving that makes the player feel clever and involved, when in fact the game is manipulating the whole situation, blocking off whole areas of its world until it figures the player may be growing bored of his current situation and powers.

This system — walling the player off until the game, or rather the designer, feels the player is ready, doling the game out in parcels measured both to prevent confusion and to manage enthusiasm and flow — has always bothered me. Mostly it feels transparent and mechanical. Its worst offenders, like Wind Waker with its inventory full of nearly identical items that each only is useful in one part of the game, raise too many questions. Why can’t I go down here? Because the game doesn’t want me to. Why can’t I open this? Because the game doesn’t want me to. Why can’t I just use the grapple instead of the hookshot? Because the game wasn’t designed that way.

A better way to limit progress is to put most of the onus on the player. Let the player decide when he’s ready to progress, and then be it on his own head. If he gets lost, or injured, or killed, or confused, that’s his decision. Let the player form his own rules: “Okay, the forest is too dangerous and is kind of scary; keep away for now.” And then later “Hey, I’m stronger and I have more resources; maybe I can risk the forest now.”

This is the system that you find in the original Zelda, and in Dragon Warrior. It’s what you get in Lost in Blue, and to an extent in Riven. And it’s more or less how Daniel Remar organized Hero Core.

( Continue reading at DIYGamer )

Fire and Ice and Gristle and Fat and Blood and Wine…

  • Reading time:2 mins read

That scene at the end of “The Family of Blood”, when the Doctor distributes weird Old Testament punishment to the antagonists of the piece? We never properly see what happened. It’s just narrated in voiceover — from the villain of the piece, no less. And it’s accompanied by over-the-top visuals. So I’m not sure how much weight we’re really supposed to give that version of events.

If you ever look in a mirror, any mirror, that’s where the sister is? Really? The son is left to dangle forever in a village cornfield — that presumably someone owns and will tend to eventually, or at least stumble across? Trapped forever in the event horizon of a star — and that’s keeping her alive? Likewise, kept alive by impossibly heavy chains? That somehow he’s just collapsing under as the Doctor walks away? The punishments don’t make the slightest sense, except in allegorical, fairy tale terms. And yet up to that point, the story tries to be fairly realistic within its own terms.

Furthermore, the way we’re shown the events, it’s all heightened. The colors are washed out, it’s grainy. The performance is all done for the camera, as if it’s illustrating the narration, rather than simply showing us a sequence of events. It’s a huge stylistic difference from the story to that point.

Anyway, how is the son narrating, and who is he narrating to, and why, if he was frozen forever?

It’s not just that the deeds don’t fit the character who we know, or who we’re shown throughout the story; it’s that the mode of storytelling doesn’t fit what we’ve seen first-hand to that point. If the sequence were intended literally, there would be much more to explain.

Maybe the Doctor did something to punish them, and maybe it was something along the lines of what we’re told, but all we have is this legend of the events, that seems to serve more to illustrate an impression or a concept of the Doctor, and of his behavior toward the antagonists, than it serves to illustrate a matter of fact. And frankly, again, we’ve just got the villain’s word for it all.

Unless there’s a sequel, we’ll never really know what happened; just that the Doctor impressed the hell out of Son-of-Mine.

Digging up the Dirt on Life+

  • Reading time:1 mins read

Life+ is a rather adorable little exploration platformer by Pastel. The game is long in development, and the development blog is updated only infrequently. The game is coming along well, though, is smooth and gorgeous, and incorporates several interesting ideas.

The main mechanic is a digging/pluck-and-throw mechanism rather like Super Mario Bros. 2, FiNCK, or Rescue Rangers — the difference being, you can rip up a clump of floor nearly anywhere. Some objects are heavier than others, and you’ll need to power-up before you can seize them. Once you’re holding something, you can toss it, bowl it, or lock onto an enemy and sling from anywhere.

( Continue reading at DIYGamer )

Primal Urges

  • Reading time:3 mins read

Chris Chibnall’s style is hugely sensationalist. You can see it in Law & Order: London, where he sorted through the archives of the original show to find the most sensational handful of scripts possible, then ramped up the sensational qualities within them, and the emotional response of all the characters in the show, such that often it all can feel a bit… icky, to my tastes. Everything that he writes seems to be a canvas for characters to make bad decisions and scream at each other.

The thing is, if that’s what you’re looking for, Chibnall is very good at it. It’s not that he doesn’t know how to write; it’s that his taste and style and judgment aren’t the kind of thing that I like much, and I’m not sure if they’re all that appropriate for Doctor Who.

It’s easy to get the two mixed up. I know I tend to dismiss anything I feel is crass or tawdry. But any aesthetic can be done well, and Chibnall has consistently shown that he knows what he’s doing and can translate his vision into any genre that’s thrown at him.

Taking this in another direction, I’m rather afraid he may be taking a note from Gatiss and Roberts here, as from the clips and the previews this episode sounds like basically a pastiche or conflation of all the fan-favorite Pertwee stories. We’ve got the town trapped under a bubble from The Dæmons. We’ve got the experiment from Inferno. We’ve got the antagonists from The Silurians.

I’m always apprehensive about stories that people describe as delightfully old-school, as it tends to mean they’re more concerned with evoking memories of past stories by quoting huge swaths of them than with taking the show into new and interesting directions. I’m sure it’s possible to make a story that evokes classic Who without simply remaking it. “Amy’s Choice” feels very 1960s to me, for instance, as does “Midnight”. That comes out of working creatively within similar logical constraints — budget, limited sets and effects — rather than rote imitation.

Of course I’ve not seen it yet, so I’m just voicing apprehensions. One sign that this story may be a bit more advanced than I fear is, perhaps unintuitively, the makeup. The original Earth Reptile stories were great, but considering the neutral line they tried to walk they were somewhat let down by the difficulty in making the antagonists individual, identifiable characters. The Silurians and the Sea Devils all look the same, and any characterization is let down by the immobility of their masks.

Of course it’s unfortunate that for a character to be identifiable that means, in cosmetic terms, to make them more like us, basically people with green bumps on their faces. But outside of complex animatronics or something, the most elegant solution is to show us the actors’ faces — their eyes and mouths and facial muscles — and to dress them individually. Then the dilemma becomes not just an intellectual exercise where, yes, in theory we can understand the Doctor’s argument that these are intelligent beings with their own legitimate argument that we ought to take seriously. Instead we might have a chance of giving a damn about the Silurians ourselves, on an emotional level.

Considering the emotional level that Chibnall likes to work on, that also makes me wary. But we’ll see.

Preview: Super Mission Extreme

  • Reading time:1 mins read

Blastforce and Sword of Legends developer Deadheat has begun to leak information about his Mission Extreme sequel, Super Mission Extreme.

The original Mission Extreme is a crunchy platform shooter that manages to find its own style in favor of simply aping Contra or Metal Slug. There’s a certain exploration element, and death is no kind of a setback. The (well-composed) music doesn’t even skip, and the action doesn’t pause. You just start up again at the last checkpoint, and all your accomplishments remain accomplished.

( Continue reading at DIYGamer )

The Game-Maker Archive: Eclypse Games

  • Reading time:1 mins read

by [redacted]

Eclypse Games was basically a guy named James Faux, aka OmegAkira. He lived and attended high school in New Jersey, and he ran a Game-Maker dial-up BBS called SiNiSTRY, which I think was also the name of his personal rock band. The board was only available irregularly, as he ran it off his primary phone line. I can’t quite remember where I first found his work; perhaps on the official RSD BBS in Rockport. Eventually I found myself calling his BBS at all weird hours, to cut down on long-distance charges.

Significantly, Jim was a musician and he was one of the few individuals outside of Epic Megagames to figure out what to do with the .CMF music format that Game-Maker relied on. So if nothing else, his games tended to be all original: new ideas, new techniques, new graphical elements, new sound effects, new music. A few of his earlier games do use the familiar stock tracks, though that tendency soon diminished.

( Continue reading at DIYGamer )

Steam Play Indie Pack

  • Reading time:1 mins read

Spring must be the season for indie game packages. Following the Humble Indie Bundle and Sleep is Death pay-what-you-want specials, and indeed Valve’s own free offer of Portal, Steam has a new package of five indie games for $20.00. Not quite as cheap, but still tidy compared with the $50.00 cover price for all five.

The Steam Play Indie Pack includes Broken Rules’ And Yet It Moves, Hassey Enterprises’ Galcon Fusion, Amanita Design’s Machinarium, Hemisphere Games’ Osmos, and (in case you haven’t already claimed it elsewhere) 2D Boy’s World of Goo.

( Continue reading at DIYGamer )